If you’re still waiting for natural language processing to make an impact in the healthcare industry, a quick look around should tell you that artificial intelligence in healthcare — inclusive of natural language processing — is doing more than just promising change – it’s driving change. More than 100 million clinical records are reviewed each year in the United States. Those records contain data – lots of it. Encounter data, pharmacy data, patient histories, social determinants of health data – all telling the story of a patient. Some of it is in electronic form; some of it is free text. All of it is vital to understanding the patient’s journey. And natural language processing is perfectly aligned to quickly and efficiently deliver the insights healthcare organizations need to provide the best quality of care to patients, while also reducing total cost of care.
Today’s natural language processing technologies alleviate much of the burden of manually recording coded conditions within electronic health records for providers, improving medical record review accuracy, and streamlining medical record review for payers and health systems thus reducing the amount of time and resources spent. For example, computerized clinical decision support systems (CDS) — dynamic tools that leverage machine learning — help physicians provide better informed care; prompt providers during various points of care to order medication, schedule healthcare screenings, vaccinations, or other important health-related needs; and help provide easily accessible health-related information at the point and time that it is needed.
Without natural language processing, CDS as a tool would be far less useful. In a report in the Journal of Biomedical Informatics about Biomedical Natural Language Processing, researchers Dina Fushman, Wendy Chapman, and Clement McDonald note that “much of the data that supports CDS is textual and therefore cannot be leveraged by a CDS system without natural language processing.”
Putting this theory to test, Dr. Dominik Aronsky and his colleagues studied the usefulness of natural language processing for a CDS system that identified community-acquired pneumonia in emergency room department patients; the results showed that the performance was significantly better with the natural language processing output – once again proving the value add of the software. In the August 2019 issue of the npj Digital Medicine journal, Doctors Trishan Panch, Heather Mattie, and Leo Celi discussed the value add of AI in healthcare, stating:
“The rapid explosion in AI has introduced the possibility of using aggregated healthcare data to produce powerful models that can automate diagnosis and also enable an increasingly precision approach to medicine by tailoring treatments and targeting resources with maximum effectiveness in a timely and dynamic manner.”
Today, natural language processing is also able to assist payers in improving coding guidelines for their associated providers, often reducing overall abrasion between the two and improving risk score accuracy and quality reporting. While this is a huge benefit to payers, there are still instances when payers have difficulty integrating the tool with their current system processes, resulting in unstructured medical notes and narrative text, ultimately causing a delay in the medical record review (MRR) process. Appropriately leveraging natural language processing technology in the healthcare industry remains complex, and the right technology can be tricky for a variety of reasons.
Language is one of the most dynamic and difficult challenges facing the use of machine learning in healthcare, as how people speak tends to differ geographically, in different disciplines, and even over time. This is especially true within the healthcare sector, as new drugs are created and our understanding of the human condition evolves.
However, there are multiple ways of evaluating the performance of the use and value of natural language processing technology in healthcare:
“For quality and administrative purposes, NLP can signal potential errors, conflicting information, or missing documentation in the chart. For public health administrators, EHR patient information can be monitored for syndromic surveillance through the analysis of ambulatory notes or chief complaints in the emergency room.”
As natural language processing continues to evolve, so will its impact on the healthcare industry. But those organizations embracing the technology and choosing to evolve with it — rather than wait for it to realize its potential — will be the organizations that truly differentiate themselves from their peers.